InSight

Our contribution

Our focus was on demonstrating the true added value of the Camera Ball under the specific requirements of the emergency services. To this end, the product was put to the test using a field-proven approach:  

Validation: In workshops, the camera ball and alternative technologies (endoscope, Insta360 camera or mini drone) were compared. After comparing the different needs and solutions, the camera ball was chosen as the most promising solution to the problem.  

Enabling: In this specific case, finding and linking all relevant contacts, as well as identifying and overcoming systemic hurdles in the course of the project, was an important mosaic for the high speed of the innovation project.  

Tests with troops: Scenarios with and without camera ball were played out under realistic conditions. We evaluated the following factors:  – It takes time – Consumption of resources such as ammunition – Wounded statistics – Subjective assessments of the troop.  

Neutral evaluation: The results were objectively analysed and practical optimisation potentials were identified.  

So What?

 The results were revealing:  

Although the Camera Ball offers an innovative solution for a better situational picture, tests have shown that the transmission distance, image quality and battery life are insufficient for most applications in Swiss-style buildings (masonry).  

Handling the ball itself is relatively self-explanatory but integrating it into tactical processes is more complicated than expected. For use in urban warfare, the Camera Ball is only really useful for complex floor plans (stairwells and elevations). The Camera Ball slows the troop down rather than makes it more efficient.  

Protection dog handlers from the Competence Center Veterinary Service and Army Animals were the only user group who saw added value and used the camera ball as a yardstick when testing new aids. The transmission distance is not a problem for them, since the dog runs on a leash. The image is also good enough for their application, and the video can theoretically be used as evidence. Finally, battery life is not a limiting factor, since the ball can be charged in the car until shortly before use.  

InSight is thus an innovation project with exemplary character – partly, or precisely because it will not be continued. Within a few months and with limited financial and personnel expenditure, a possible solution to the problem could be examined and verified with the relevant user group. The added value for these was denied, and the innovation project was thus concluded.